Cases 1 - 6 of 6
MCELROY et al v. 3M COMPANY
as 2:2010cv84890
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH P. MCELROY and CAROL MCELROY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY , AC & R INSULATION CO., INC. , A.W. CHESTERTON, CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McElroy et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2010cv02573
Plaintiff:
Joseph P. McElroy and Carol McElroy
Defendant:
3M Company , AC & R Insulation Co., Inc. , A.W. Chesterton, Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thorne et al v. AC&R Insulation Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv01839
Plaintiff:
Alvin Thorne and Courtney Thorne
Defendant:
AC&R Insulation Co., Inc. , Bondex International, Inc. , Certainteed Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SAMMARTINO et al v. AC & RINSULATION CO., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv73800
Plaintiff:
ARMANDO A. SAMMARTINO and THERESE SAMMARTINO
Defendant:
AC & RINSULATION CO., INC., A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, BALTIMORE AIRCOIL COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
RUSH v. OWENS-CORNING CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv62127
Plaintiff:
LINDA S. RUSH, LINDA S. RUSH and LINDA S. RUSH
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING CORPORATION, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
ACANDS, INC., ACANDS, INC., ACANDS, INC. and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE PERSONAL INJURY SETTLEMENT TRUST DISTRIBUTION PROCESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
NICHOLLS v. OWENS-CORNING CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv62124
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE W. NICHOLLS and LAWRENCE W. NICHOLLS
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING CORPORATION, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
ACANDS, INC., ACANDS, INC., ACANDS, INC. and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE PERSONAL INJURY SETTLEMENT TRUST DISTRIBUTION PROCESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
