Cases 1 - 10 of 85
Moore v. Hughes et al
as 4:2024cv04063
Plaintiff:
Robbie J Moore
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Tyrone Baker, Wesly Christopherson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Wills et al
as 1:2024cv02794
Petitioner:
William Johnson
Respondent:
Anthony Wills and Kwame Raoul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bolden v. Raoul et al
as 4:2024cv04024
Plaintiff:
Donnell Bolden
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul, Heidi Epperson, Elaine Bochenek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christmas v. Pritzker et al
as 1:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Demond Christmas
Defendant:
J.B. Pritzer, Iris Y. Martinez, Brendan F. Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hydron v. Donathan et al
as 4:2024cv04002
Plaintiff:
Kyle Hydron
Defendant:
Greg Donathan, Erin Posey, Sandra Ham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eason v. Raoul et al
as 3:2023cv50462
Defendant:
AFSCME, Kwame Raoul, J. B. Pritzker and others
Plaintiff:
Hannibal Eason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayden v. Hughes et al
as 1:2023cv01442
Petitioner:
Richard T Hayden
Respondent:
Latoya Hughes, Cherryl Hinthorne and Kwame Raoule
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kevin Childs v. Kwame Raoul
as 23-3281
Petitioner / Appellant:
KEVIN CHILDS
Respondent / Appellee:
CHERRYLE HINTHORNE, Warden and KWAME RAOUL
Smith v. Pritzker et al
as 4:2023cv04205
Plaintiff:
Michael W Smith
Defendant:
J B Pritzker, Kwame Raoul, Gregg Donathan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Racanelli v. Pritizker et al
as 4:2023cv04197
Plaintiff:
Joseph Racanelli
Defendant:
J B Pritizker, Kwame Raoul, Gregg Donathan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
