Cases 1 - 10 of 138
Moore v. Hughes et al
as 4:2024cv04063
Plaintiff:
Robbie J Moore
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Tyrone Baker, Wesly Christopherson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Wills et al
as 1:2024cv02794
Petitioner:
William Johnson
Respondent:
Anthony Wills and Kwame Raoul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Farag v. Biden et al
as 1:2024cv02728
Plaintiff:
Tarek Farag
Defendant:
Joseph Biden, Alejandro Mayorkas, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Miles v. Raoul et al
as 1:2024cv01914
Plaintiff:
Daniel L. Miles
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul, Nathalina A. Hudson, Pamela Blackorby and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Williams Jr. et al v. Pritzker et al
as 1:2024cv01441
Plaintiff:
Andy Williams Jr. and Tyrone Muhammad
Defendant:
Jay Robert Pritzker, Kwame Raoul, Brandon F. Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bolden v. Raoul et al
as 4:2024cv04024
Plaintiff:
Donnell Bolden
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul, Heidi Epperson, Elaine Bochenek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Association for Accessible Medicines v. Raoul
as 1:2024cv00544
Plaintiff:
Association for Accessible Medicines
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Christmas v. Pritzker et al
as 1:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Demond Christmas
Defendant:
J.B. Pritzer, Iris Y. Martinez, Brendan F. Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hydron v. Donathan et al
as 4:2024cv04002
Plaintiff:
Kyle Hydron
Defendant:
Greg Donathan, Erin Posey, Sandra Ham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eason v. Raoul et al
as 3:2023cv50462
Defendant:
AFSCME, Kwame Raoul, J. B. Pritzker and others
Plaintiff:
Hannibal Eason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
