Cases 1 - 10 of 725
George Glickman et al v. ABB Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv09881
Defendant:
Fryer-Knowles, Inc., a California Corporation, Valves and Controls US, Inc., Eaton Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Sharon Glickman and George Glickman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Jason Dunlavey et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv08746
Defendant:
Carrier Corporation, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Graybar Electric Company, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
National Steel and Shipbuilding Company
Plaintiff:
Todd Dunlavey, an Individual, Eric Dunlavey, an Individual and Jason Dunlavey, Individually and as Personal Representatiive of the Estate of David L. Dunlavey, Deceased
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Brittan et al v. Greene, Tweed & Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv03874
Defendant:
Aurora Pump Company, 3M Company, Weir Valves & Controls USA, Inc. and others
Cross-Complainant:
Redco Corporation and Crane Co.
Plaintiff:
Harry L. Brittan and Nancy Brittan
Cross-Defendant:
Honeywell International Inc., Morse Tec LLC, O'Reilly Auto Enterprises, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Leslie Chappel et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv04628
Defendant:
Genuine Parts Company doing business as National Automotive Parts Association also known as NAPA, Armstrong International, Inc., General Electric Company and others
Plaintiff:
Linda Chappell and Leslie Chappel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Dutschmann v. 84 Lumber Company, a limited partnership et al
as 3:2024cv01153
Cross Defendant:
Aubrey Dutschmann, BW/IP Inc., Clark-Reliance Corporation and others
Defendant:
84 Lumber Company, a limited partnership, Ace Hardware Corporation, Advance Stores Company Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Sarjeant et al v. City of Long Beach et al
as 3:2024cv01216
Defendant:
ALLIED FLUID PRODUCTS CORP., formerly known as ALLIED PACKING & SUPPLY, INC., KM Industries Holding Co., Inc., formerly known as Kelly-Moore Paint Company, Inc., Owl Companies, individually and as parent, alter-ego-equitable trustee, joint venture, and as succesoor-in-interest to Smith-Amelco and Owl Constuctors, formerly known as HC. Smith Construction Co. and others
Plaintiff:
James Sarjeant and Lucretia Sarjeant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Boyce A. Stringer et al v. American Biltrite, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv09813
Defendant:
DOMCO PRODUCTS TEXAS, INC., Individually and as Successor-In-Interest to, and formerly known as DOMCO INC., FLOOR PRODUCTS (TEXAS), AZROCK INDUSTRIES INC., UVALDE ROCK ASPHALT COMPANY, REDCO CORPORATION, formerly known as CRANE CO., Individually and as Successor-In-Interest to COCHRANE CORPORATION, AMERICAN BILTRITE INC. and others
Plaintiff:
Boyce Stringer, Nancy Stringer, Boyce A. Stringer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
Leopold v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv03713
Defendant:
Genuine Parts Company doing business as NATIONAL AUTOMOTIVE PARTS ASSOCIATION also known as NAPA, Industrial Holdings Corporation, Morse TEC, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Debra Leopold
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Gerads v. 84 Lumber Company et al
as 3:2023cv03672
Plaintiff:
James Gerads
Defendant:
84 Lumber Company, Ace Hardware Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Successor-by-Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Love et al v. BNSF Railway Company et al
as 4:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
Leonard D. Love and Karen L. Morey
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company, Robinson Insulation Company, Grogan Robinson Lumber Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
