Civil Rights Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
ROSSMANN v. SAPIN et al
as 1:2023cv03123
Plaintiff: BRUD ROSSMANN
Defendant: LINDA SAPIN, PHILIP PULASKI, JOHN MAXWELL FINLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STRIPLIN v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2023cv01739
Plaintiff: AAREN STRIPLIN and AARON WILLIAMS STRIPLIN
Defendant: JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., KAMALA HARRIS, ROBERT MUELLER and others
DICKSON v. BISNOTT et al
as 1:2022cv03047
Plaintiff: SIMONE DICKSON
Defendant: BRITTANY BISNOTT and KAMALA HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
BARRETT v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2022cv02823
Plaintiff: JEFFREY P. BARRETT
Defendant: JOSEPH BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS, BARACK OBAMA and others
Claimant: NANCY PELOSI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
IRONS v. BOWSER et al
as 1:2022cv02348
Plaintiff: TONI IRONS
Defendant: MURIEL BOWSER and KAMALA HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ALEJANDRO v. BIDEN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00405
Plaintiff: OMAR MEDINA ALEJANDRO
Defendant: JOSEPH BIDEN and KAMALA HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FRETZ v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2021cv03053
Plaintiff: ANGELA LAUREN FRETZ
Defendant: JOE BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS, ANTHONY FAUCI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
IRONS v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2021cv02451
Plaintiff: TONI IRONS
Defendant: JOE BIDEN and KAMALA HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MAHONEY v. PELOSI et al
as 1:2021cv00859
Defendant: UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE BOARD, KAREN H GIBSON, SPEAKER NANCY PELOSI and others
Plaintiff: REV. PATRICK J. MAHONEY and PATRICK J. MAHONEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRANCH v. ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 1:2017cv00971
Plaintiff: CLARENCE A BRANCH, III
Defendant: ATTORNEY GENERAL, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, YMCA OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?