Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Kareem Milhouse v. Saroj Gulani et al
as 5:2023cv01461
Plaintiff:
Kareem Milhouse
Defendant:
Doctor Saroj Gulani, Steenberger, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kareem Milhouse v. B. Lammer
as 5:2023cv01205
Petitioner:
Kareem Milhouse
Respondent:
B. Lammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
MILHOUSE v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2023cv02297
Plaintiff:
KAREEM MILHOUSE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS, THOMAS PERZICHILLI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Milhouse v. Harr et al
as 2:2023cv00065
Plaintiff:
Kareem Milhouse
Defendant:
Harr, OBrien, Rosenwhig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Milhouse v. Harr et al
as 5:2023cv00047
Plaintiff:
Kareem Milhouse
Defendant:
Harr, OBrien, Rosenwhig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Milhouse v. United States of America et al
as 5:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
Kareem Milhouse
Defendant:
United States of America, O. Haughton, FNU Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Kareem Milhouse v. Terry O'Brien
as 15-6387
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAREEM MILHOUSE
Defendant - Appellee:
TERRY O'BRIEN, Warden, FANNING, Psychologist (Chief), GREGORY MIMS, Clintical and Medical Director and others
Milhouse v. Ebbert
as 1:2014cv01971
Petitioner:
Kareem Milhouse
Respondent:
David J. Ebbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kareem Milhouse v. Terry O'Brien
as 14-6873
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAREEM MILHOUSE
Defendant - Appellee:
TERRY O'BRIEN, Warden, ODOM, J. GULLY and others
Milhouse v. O'Brien et al
as 1:2014cv00056
Plaintiff:
Kareem Milhouse
Defendant:
Terry O'Brien, Fanning and W. Odom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
