Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Michael Bargo, Jr. v. Porter County, Indiana, et al
as 18-1040
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL E. BARGO, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
PORTER COUNTY, INDIANA, VICKI URBANIK, in her official capacity as Auditor of Porter County IN, ELIZABETH A. KNIGHT and others
Michael Bargo, Jr. v. Porter County, Indiana, et al
as 17-3021
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL E. BARGO, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
PORTER COUNTY, INDIANA, VICKI URBANIK, in her official capacity as Auditor of Porter County IN, ELIZABETH A. KNIGHT and others
Bargo v. Porter County Indiana et al
as 2:2016cv00177
Plaintiff:
Michael E Bargo, Jr
Defendant:
Porter County Indiana, Vicki Urbanik, Elizabeth A Knight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caldwell v. Martin
as 2:2015cv00133
Plaintiff:
Chase Caldwell
Defendant:
Karen M Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BASKIN et al v. BOGAN et al
as 1:2014cv00355
Plaintiff:
MARILYN RAE BASKIN, DAWN LYNN CARVER, PAMELA RUTH ELEASE EANES and others
Defendant:
PEGGY BEAVER, PENNY BOGAN, MICHAEL A. BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00367
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Martin v. TRI Staffing, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv01423
Plaintiff:
Karen M Martin
Defendant:
Elwood TRI, Inc. and Honda Manufacturing of Alabama, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Kesel v. Martin et al
as 2:2012cv00139
Plaintiff:
Diana L Kesel
Defendant:
Karen M Martin , Porter County Indiana , Porter County Board of Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Hammond v. Martin et al
as 2:2012cv00137
Plaintiff:
Margaret Hammond
Defendant:
Karen M Martin , Porter County Indiana , Porter County Board of Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
