Other Statutes Cases filed in the Federal Circuit Courts
Cases 121 - 130 of 135
Universal Electronics, Inc.In re: Universal Electronics, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-1757
Appellant: In re: UNIVERSAL ELECTRONICS, INC.
Appellee: KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
In re: Universal Electronics, Inc.
as 22-1717
Appellant: In re: UNIVERSAL ELECTRONICS, INC.
Appellee: KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
In re: Universal Electronics, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-1716
Appellant: In re: UNIVERSAL ELECTRONICS, INC.
Appellee: KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
In re: Universal Electronics, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-1718
Appellant: In re: UNIVERSAL ELECTRONICS, INC.
Appellee: KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
AdamsIn re: Adams We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-1705
Appellant: In re: PHILLIP M. ADAMS
Appellee: KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Medytox, Inc. v. Galderma S.A. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-1165
Appellant: MEDYTOX, INC.
Appellee: GALDERMA S.A., GALDERMA LABORATORIES INC., GALDERMA LABORATORIES, L.P. and others
Intervenor: KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Hyatt v. PTO We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-2324
Plaintiff / Appellant: GILBERT P. HYATT
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, ANDREI IANCU, ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office and others
Incept LLC v. Palette Life Sciences, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-2063
Appellee: PALETTE LIFE SCIENCES, INC.
Appellant: INCEPT LLC
Intervenor: ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Acting Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Acting Deputy Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office and KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Carucel Investments L.P. v. Vidal We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-1731
Appellant: CARUCEL INVESTMENTS L.P.
Appellee: VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, INC. and UNIFIED PATENTS, LLC
Intervenor: ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Acting Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Acting Deputy Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office and KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
In re: Miller We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-1599
Appellant: In re: TONIA WALSTAD MILLER
Appellee: ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office and ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Acting Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Acting Deputy Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?