Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01727
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burnett et al v. Rasmussen
as 1:2024cv01030
Defendant:
Teagan Rasmussen
Counter-Claimant:
Teagan Rasmussen
Counter-Defendant:
Kathleen Burnett and Tyler Lalicker
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Burnett and Tyler Lalicker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Burnett, et al v.Rasmussen
as 1:2023cv00503
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN BURNETT and TYLER LALICKER
Defendant:
RASMUSSEN TEAGUE, Teague Rasmussen and Teagan Rasmussen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
BURNETT v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2019cv05651
Defendant:
PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN BURNETT
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BURNETT v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2018cv02895
Defendant:
PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN BURNETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Welch v. Wacker-Chemie AG et al
as 1:2014cv00014
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Burnette Welch
Defendant:
Wacker-Chemie AG , Wacker-Chemie Achte Venture GmbH, Inc. , Wacker Polysilicon North America, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ashton Healthcare v. Burnett et al
as 3:2009cv01913
Plaintiff:
Ashton Healthcare
Defendant:
Kathleen Burnett, EBS-RMSCO, Inc., Guthrie Healthcare and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Aguilar et al v. Pilgrims Pride Corporation
as 1:2007cv01040
Plaintiff:
Salvador Aguilar, Anthony Atkins, Marilyn Bailey and others
Defendant:
Pilgrims Pride Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
