Cases 1 - 10 of 17
ROGERS v. SATAN GOD et al
as 2:2016cv00079
Plaintiff:
KEVIN ROGERS
Defendant:
SATAN GOD, BARAK OBAMA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GLOUCESTER MANOR REHABILITATION AND CARE CENTER, INC. v. SEBELIUS et al
as 1:2013cv06875
Plaintiff:
GLOUCESTER MANOR REHABILITATION AND CARE CENTER, INC.
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, MARILYN TAVENNER, MARY O'DOWD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
DECRISCIO v. SEBELIUS et al
as 1:2013cv06672
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER DECRISCIO
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS and COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BESLER & COMPANY, INC. v. SEBELIUS et al
as 3:2013cv01251
Plaintiff:
BESLER & COMPANY, INC.
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS and PROVIDER REIMBURSEMENT REVIEW BOARD
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
BECKER, D.P.M. v. SEBELIUS
as 2:2012cv06177
Plaintiff:
SIMON BECKER, D.P.M.
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
NATIONWIDE AMBULANCE SERVICES, INC. v. SEBELIUS
as 2:2012cv06147
Plaintiff:
NATIONWIDE AMBULANCE SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
TUCKER v. SEBELIUS
as 1:2012cv05900
Plaintiff:
KAREN TUCKER
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
TARANSKY v. SEBELIUS et al
as 1:2012cv04437
Plaintiff:
CECELIA A. TARANSKY
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
NATIONWIDE AMBULANCE SERVICES, INC. v. SEBELIUS
as 2:2012cv04293
Plaintiff:
NATIONWIDE AMBULANCE SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
LARSEN v. VELEZ et al
as 2:2012cv00771
Petitioner:
MARK LARSEN
Respondent:
JENNIFER VELEZ, ESQ., VALERIE J. HARR, HEALTH MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC. (HMS) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
