Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Thomas et al v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv00077
Plaintiff:
David E. Thomas, Kathy Thomas and Bethany Diven
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Carrillo v. Thomas et al
as 3:2021cv00423
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Carrillo
Defendant:
Kathy Thomas, Scott Davis, W. Gittere and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al
as 3:2020cv07267
Plaintiff:
Heidi W Sermersheim, Wayne Riley, Marvin M D'Amore and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc., incorrectly designated as Doe 4, Safeway, Inc., Kaiser Permanente International and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas et al v. LivaNova Deutschland GmbH et al
as 1:2018cv00247
Plaintiff:
Kathy Thomas and James Thomas
Defendant:
Livanova Deutschland GMBH and Sorin Group USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas et al v. LivaNova Deutschland GmbH et al
as IAS/4:17-cv-00360
Plaintiff:
Kathy Thomas and James Thomas
Defendant:
LivaNova Deutschland GmbH and Sorin Group USA, Inc.
Thomas et al v. LivaNova Deutschland GmbH et al
as 4:2017cv00360
Plaintiff:
Kathy Thomas and James Thomas
Defendant:
LivaNova Deutschland GmbH and Sorin Group USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMAS et al v. LUMBER LIQUIDATORS INC
as 1:2017cv02808
Plaintiff:
Kathy Thomas and David Thomas
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMAS et al v. LUMBER LIQUIDATORS INC
as GAM/5:17-cv-00257
Plaintiff:
KATHY THOMAS and DAVID THOMAS
Defendant:
LUMBER LIQUIDATORS INC
THOMAS et al v. LUMBER LIQUIDATORS INC
as 5:2017cv00257
Plaintiff:
KATHY THOMAS and DAVID THOMAS
Defendant:
LUMBER LIQUIDATORS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMAS et al v. LUMBER LIQUIDATORS, INC.
as 5:2017cv00256
Plaintiff:
KATHY THOMAS and DAVID THOMAS
Defendant:
LUMBER LIQUIDATORS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
