Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Chaisson v. Lafayette Parish Correctional Center et al
as 6:2018cv01509
Defendant:
Medical Dept of Lafayette Parish Correctional Center, Lafayette Parish Correctional Center, Mrs Marie and others
Plaintiff:
La'Dontray L Chaisson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv04280
Plaintiff:
Kayla Smith
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reichel et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv00215
Plaintiff:
Carole Reichel , Annie Johnson , Kayla Smith and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation , Eli Lilly and Company , aaiPharma, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Adecco USA, Inc.
as 2:2014cv01210
Plaintiff:
Kayla Smith
Defendant:
Adecco USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Carole Reichel, et al v. Eli Lilly and Company
as 13-80092
Plaintiff - Respondent:
CAROLE REICHEL, ANNIE JOHNSON, KAYLA SMITH and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Reichel et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv05945
Plaintiff:
Carole Reichel , Annie Johnson , Kayla Smith and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation , Eli Lilly and Company , Aaipharma, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Green et al v. Coachmen Industries, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00196
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Green , Alexis Bradley , Leonard Bradley and others
Defendant:
Coachmen Industries, Inc., Coachmen Recreational Vehicle Company, LLC, CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Green et al v. Coachmen Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00481
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Green , All Plaintiffs , Alexis Bradley and others
Defendant:
Coachmen Industries, Inc., Coachmen Recreational Vehicle Company, LLC, Bechtel International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
