Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Johnny Mcgill v. Riverbend Correctional Facility, et al
as 23-11245
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHNNY ANDREW MCGILL
Defendant / Appellee:
RIVERBEND CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, KEEFE COMMISSARY NETWORK, LLC, CHARLES COLEMAN and others
MCGILL v. RIVERBEND CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 5:2022cv00418
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY ANDREW MCGILL
Defendant:
RIVERBEND CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, KEEFE COMMISSARY NETWORK, CHARLES COLEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
George Richard Mendoza v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-11885
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GEORGE RICHARD MENDOZA
Defendant / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and KEEFE COMMISSARY NETWORK, LLC
Domenique Pierce v. JPAY, INC., et al
as 20-14326
Defendant / Appellee:
ACCESS CORRECTIONS, IBM CORP., KEEFE COMMISSARY NETWORK, LLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOMENIQUE PIERCE
Pierce et al v. JPay, Inc. et al
as 8:2020cv01088
Plaintiff:
Olivia Nora, Charlotte Kellie, Domenique Pierce and others
Defendant:
JPay, Inc., Keefe Commissary Network, IBM Corp. and others
WHITAKER v. INCH et al
as 4:2019cv00282
Defendant:
MARK INCH, GEO GROUP INC, TRINITY SERVICES GROUP and others
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA B WHITAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez et al v. JPay, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv14137
Plaintiff:
Otis Clayton and Matthew Rodriguez
Defendant:
JPay, Inc. and Keefe Commissary Network, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Micko v. Jones et al
as 1:2018cv21242
Plaintiff:
George Micko
Defendant:
Julie L. Jones and Keefe Commissary Network, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARNES v. JONES et al
as 4:2017cv00582
Plaintiff:
OMAR F BARNES
Defendant:
JULIE JONES, KEEFE COMMISSARY NETWORK LLC and JOHN CLARK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2014cv00946
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
