Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Pettis v. Keefe Commissary Network
as 5:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Sammie Henry Pettis
Defendant:
Keefe Commissary Network
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00454
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Sangamon County Sheriffs Office et al
as 3:2022cv00415
Plaintiff:
Aaron Edwards
Defendant:
Sangamon County Sheriffs Office, Extended Stay of America, Government Official Capacity and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Keefe Commissary Network et al
as 3:2015cv00335
Plaintiff:
Whitzey Santaiz Walker
Defendant:
Keefe Commissary Network, M.D.O.C., Christopher Epps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schwindling v. Keefe Commissary Network, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00382
Plaintiff:
George Ameil Schwindling
Defendant:
Keefe Commissary Network, Inc., Trish Jolly, Eddie Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. The GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00081
Plaintiff:
William L. Johnson
Defendant:
The GEO Group, Inc., Jessie Streeter, T. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00404
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Pryer v. Epps et al
as 3:2010cv00185
Plaintiff:
Timothy G. Pryer
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, M.D.O.C., Thelma Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
