Cases 1 - 10 of 1,346
Mauricio M. Joffre v. Keenan and Associates et al
as 2:2024cv02853
Plaintiff:
Mauricio M. Joffre
Defendant:
Keenan and Associates and Does 1 through 100, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
McCabe v. Keenan
as 24-876
Plaintiff:
MARY JO MCCABE
Defendant:
MAYNARD JAMES KEENAN, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, JOHN J. MCCABE FAMILY and others
Harris v. Reeves et al
as 3:2024cv00547
Plaintiff:
Gerard Vondrake Harris
Defendant:
Robert S. Reeves, Cathy S. Palmer, Ralph Todd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Benshoof v. United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, Seattle
as 24-1958
Petitioner:
KURT BENSHOOF
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE
Interested Party:
FREYA BRIER, MOSHE ADMON, CITY OF SEATTLE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00708
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
(PC) Grissom v. Keenan et al
as 2:2024cv00926
Plaintiff:
Howard Dupree Grissom
Defendant:
Stephanie Keenan and Meadows
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keenan et al v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01960
Plaintiff:
Robert Keenan and Ivette Keenan
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc. and Exactech, U.S., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Benshoof v. Keenan
as 2:2024cv00382
Plaintiff:
Kurt A Benshoof
Defendant:
David S Keenan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ghyam v. Keenan & Associates
as 8:2024cv00544
Plaintiff:
Donna Ghyam
Defendant:
Keenan & Associates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Basra v. Keenan, et al.
as 24-1540
Petitioner:
PARAMJIT SINGH BASRA
Respondent:
DAVID KEENAN, The Honorable Judge and DONALD RAZ, Prosecuting Attorney
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
