Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Dixon et al v. Lane et al
as 3:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Vesta Melinda Dixon, Austin Keith Dixon, Corey Tyler Dixon and others
Defendant:
Rodney E Lane, II, Quality Carriers, Inc. and Old Republic Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Dixon v. Coker et al
as 1:2022cv00105
Plaintiff:
Keith Dixon
Defendant:
Ellis J. Coker, Jr. and ACW Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
DIXON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv34965
Plaintiff:
KEITH DIXON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dixon III v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2020cv01725
Interested Party:
USAO-SS-Noticing and SSA Noticing
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Thomas Keith Dixon III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Dixon III v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2018cv02923
Interested Party:
USAO-SS-Noticing and SSA Noticing
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Thomas Keith Dixon III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Dixon v. Redman et al
as 5:2016cv00214
Plaintiff:
Quaran Keith Dixon
Defendant:
FNU Redman and FNU Eslenger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-2785
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Dixon v. Hooks
as 1:2015cv00589
Petitioner:
Keith Dixon
Respondent:
Brad Hooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dixon v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2014cv00321
Plaintiff:
Travis Keith Dixon
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Miscellaneous_party:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv04551
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
