Cases 1 - 10 of 1,028
Hatchett v. Clark, et al.
as 25-2063
Plaintiff:
CECIL JEROME HATCHETT
Defendant:
KEN CLARK, FISHER INVESTMENT GROUP, Investment Management, FRANKLIN TEMPLETON INVESTMENT GROUP, Investment Management and others
Joseph Gabriel Klotz v. Ken Clark et al
as 2:2025cv01962
Plaintiff:
Joseph Gabriel Klotz
Defendant:
Ken Clark, Dr. Rhodes, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Davis v. Clark et al
as 1:2025cv00229
Plaintiff:
Keenan Dwayne Davis
Defendant:
Ken Clark, J. Oehlert, M. Romero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Hatchett v. Clark
as 2:2024cv03744
Petitioner:
Cecil Jerome Hatchett
Respondent:
Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martinez v. Campbell, et al.
as 24-5381
Defendant:
ALVARADO, Correctional Officer, GURROLA, Correctional Officer, E. MCDANIEL, Chief Executive Officer and others
Plaintiff:
RONALD F. MARTINEZ
Suarez v. Valladolid, et al.
as 24-5286
Defendant:
B. CAMARGO, O. VALLADOLID, GAMBOA and others
Plaintiff:
JOSE ALFREDO SUAREZ
(HC) Hatchett v. Clark
as 2:2024cv02135
Petitioner:
Cecil Jerome Hatchett
Respondent:
Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Hatchett v. Clark
as 2:2024cv01627
Petitioner:
Cecil Jerome Hatchett
Respondent:
Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
EEON et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv01626
Defendant:
CHARLES W. SCHARF, SCOTT D. GILES, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff:
EEON and EEON FOUNDATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hatchett v. Clark
as 4:2024cv03246
Respondent:
Warden Ken Clark
Petitioner:
Cecil Jerome Hatchett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
