Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 112
Eeon, et al v. USA, et al
as 25-5161
Plaintiff: Eeon, A Sole Proprietor and Eeon Foundation, A Sole Proprietorship
Defendant: United States of America, Federal Reserve Bank, Christopher Murray, Cuyahoga County Treasurer and others
Hatchett v. Clark, et al.
as 25-2063
Plaintiff: CECIL JEROME HATCHETT
Defendant: KEN CLARK, FISHER INVESTMENT GROUP, Investment Management, FRANKLIN TEMPLETON INVESTMENT GROUP, Investment Management and others
Martinez v. Campbell, et al.
as 24-5381
Defendant: ALVARADO, Correctional Officer, GURROLA, Correctional Officer, E. MCDANIEL, Chief Executive Officer and others
Plaintiff: RONALD F. MARTINEZ
Suarez v. Valladolid, et al.
as 24-5286
Defendant: B. CAMARGO, O. VALLADOLID, GAMBOA and others
Plaintiff: JOSE ALFREDO SUAREZ
EEON et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv01626
Defendant: CHARLES W. SCHARF, SCOTT D. GILES, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff: EEON and EEON FOUNDATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Clark
as 24-2277
Petitioner: LAWRENCE CHRISTOPHER SMITH
Respondent: KEN CLARK, Warden
Torres v. Clark
as 24-1946
Petitioner: MACARIO TORRES
Respondent: KEN CLARK
Jace v. Lirones, et al.
as 24-1742
Plaintiff: MICHAEL JACE
Defendant: MARGARET LIRONES, Senior Librarian at CSP-Corcoran, KEN CLARK, Warden at CSP-Corcoran and A. PETERSON, Captain 4B Yard at CSP-Corcoran
Hill v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento
as 24-1583
Petitioner: NATHAN HILL
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Interested Party: GAVIN NEWSOM, RALPH DIAZ, Director of CDCR, KEN CLARK, Warden of CSP-Corcoran and others
Jace v. Lirones, et al.
as 24-372
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL JACE
Defendant / Appellee: MARGARET LIRONES, Senior Librarian at CSP-Corcoran, KEN CLARK, Warden at CSP-Corcoran and A. PETERSON, Captain 4B Yard at CSP-Corcoran

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?