Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Brown v. Frost-Arnett Company
as 3:2017cv00069
Plaintiff:
Kendall Brown
Defendant:
Frost-Arnett Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cooper v. Primary Care Solutions, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00259
Plaintiff:
Kendall Brown, Tammy Cooper and Cross Over Therapy, LLC
Defendant:
Monica Lewis, Primary Care Solutions, Inc., Kim Roundtree and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Browne v. Hynes et al
as 1:2016cv00503
Plaintiff:
Kendall Browne
Defendant:
Hon. Andrew M. Cuomo, Charles J. Hynes, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boggs v. Holder (CONSENT)
as 3:2015cv00244
Plaintiff:
Kendal Brown Boggs
Defendant:
Tommetrius Lamar Holder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bradley et al v. Stupar et al
as 4:2015cv00017
Plaintiff:
Erick Bradley , Eboni Pruden Bradley , Shaheem Pruden and others
Defendant:
DEA Agent Michael S. Stupar, Unnamed DEA Agents John Doe 1, 2, 3, and 4, Joseph Jansson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Howard, et al
as 1:2013cv05109
Plaintiff:
Kendall Brown
Defendant:
Erick Howard, Uknown and Unnamed City of Chicago Police Officers and City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Browne v. Schneiderman
as 1:2013cv01679
Plaintiff:
Kendall Browne
Defendant:
Eric Schneiderman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Monte Greenawalt Revocable Trust et al v. Brown et al
as 2:2012cv01983
Defendant:
W. Kendall Brown and Brown & Associates
Plaintiff:
Ruth Greenawalt and Monte Greenawalt Revocable Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00472
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights: Employment
BROWN v. ARRESTING OFFICERS
as 2:2009cv02190
Plaintiff:
KENDALL BROWN
Defendant:
ARRESTING OFFICERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
