Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Kennedy Minnifield v. Limestone CF Warden, et al
as 24-10083
Petitioner:
KENNEDY MINNIFIELD
Respondent:
LIMESTONE CF WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Minnifield v. Crabtree et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00664
Plaintiff:
Kennedy Minnifield
Defendant:
Chadwick Crabtree, Bullock County Circuit Court, State of Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Minnifield v. Warden Crabtree et al
as 5:2023cv00986
Petitioner:
Kennedy Minnifield
Respondent:
Warden Crabtree and Attorney General for the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Minnifield v. Toney et al (INMATE 3) (MEMBER)
as 2:2020cv00933
Defendant:
Parole Board State of Alabama, Deborah Toney and Steven T. Marshall
Plaintiff:
Kennedy Minnifield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Minnifield v. Graddick et al (INMATE 3) (LEAD)
as 2:2020cv00798
Plaintiff:
Kennedy Minnifield
Defendant:
Charles Graddick, Deborah Toney, Steven T. Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Minnifield v. Pulliam
as 5:2020cv01259
Plaintiff:
Kennedy Minnifield
Defendant:
TT Pulliam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Minnifield v. Jefferson County et al
as 7:2019cv00618
Defendant:
Jefferson County and Judge Bill Cole
Plaintiff:
Kennedy Minnifield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Kennedy Minnifield
as 18-13245
Petitioner:
In re: KENNEDY MINNIFIELD
Mandamus Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Kennedy Minnifield v. Warden, et al
as 18-12983
Petitioner - Appellant:
KENNEDY MINNIFIELD
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, Tong and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Minnifield v. Tong et al
as 2:2018cv00705
Petitioner:
Kennedy Minnifield
Respondent:
Tong and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
