Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Qian Williams v. Dale Taylor, et al
as 25-3230
Plaintiff:
QIAN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
DALE TAYLOR, KENNETH BAKER, KARL P. KADON, III and others
Soto v. County of Chester et al
as 1:2025cv00951
Plaintiff:
Anais Soto
Defendant:
County of Chester, Enterprise FM Trust, Inc. and Kenneth Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 nr Notice of Removal
Baker v. United States of America
as 7:2025cv00037
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Baker, Sr.
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Cause Of Action: Camp Lejeune Justice Act of 2022
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00783
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Baker v. Spitzer et al
as 3:2024cv00325
Defendant:
Anderson County Circuit Court, Ryan Spitzer and Elaine Herrera
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Baker, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
BAKER v. THE CITY OF LONG BRANCH et al
as 3:2024cv04384
Plaintiff:
KENNETH BAKER
Defendant:
THE CITY OF LONG BRANCH, LIEUTENANT JORGE SILVERIO, CHRISTOPHER REMEDIOS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Baker v. Cerliano et al
as 6:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Baker
Defendant:
Sheriff Maxey Cerliano, Cpl. Devon Fuller, Cpl. Ryan Rimlinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00747
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Baker
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. Taylor et al
as 1:2023cv00002
Plaintiff:
Qian Williams
Defendant:
Dale Taylor and Kenneth Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Taylor et al
as 1:2022cv00769
Plaintiff:
Qian Williams
Defendant:
Dale Taylor, Kenneth Baker, Karl Kadon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
