Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Jones v. Rivello et al
as 1:2022cv00825
Petitioner:
Eric Kenneth Jones
Respondent:
John Rivello, Josh Shapiro and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JONES et al v. MONSANTO COMPANY et al
as 2:2020cv06828
Defendant:
MONSANTO COMPANY and BAYER CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
KENNETH JONES and MARJORIE JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
as 2:2017cv01011
Plaintiff:
KENNETH JONES
Defendant:
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
CORPORATE SYNERGIES GROUP, LLC v. JONES
as 1:2017cv00775
Plaintiff:
CORPORATE SYNERGIES GROUP, LLC
Defendant:
KENNETH JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eric Jones v. Superintendent Coal Township S, et al
as 15-3102
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC KENNETH JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT COAL TOWNSHIP SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAUPHIN COUNTY
In re: Eric Jone
as 15-2482
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: ERIC KENNETH JONES
Defendant - Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT COAL TOWNSHIP SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAUPHIN COUNTY
Nominal Respondent:
YVETTE KANE
Phillips v. Jones
as 3:2014cv02490
Plaintiff:
Matthew Phillips
Defendant:
Kenneth Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. NEW HAMPSHIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 3:2014cv05685
Plaintiff:
KENNETH JONES
Defendant:
NEW HAMPSHIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072 Payment of Flood Insurance Claim
JONES v. NEW HAMPSHIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2014cv05685
Plaintiff:
KENNETH JONES
Defendant:
NEW HAMPSHIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072
Jones v. PA State Attorney General et al
as 1:2013cv02526
Petitioner:
Eric Kenneth Jones
Respondent:
Vincent Mooney and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
