Cases 11 - 20 of 81
Johnson v. Sconyers, et al. (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00724
Plaintiff:
Antonio Rashad Johnson
Defendant:
Kenneth Sconyers, Carter Davenport, Richard Hager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00710
Plaintiff:
David Lamar Johnson
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Carla Jones, Shawn C. Logan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hastings v. Sconyers et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00698
Plaintiff:
Raymond D. Hastings
Defendant:
Kenneth Sconyers , Nathaniel Lawson , Brian Gordon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Sconyers et al (INMATE 3)
as 1:2013cv00650
Plaintiff:
Cardella Antionne Jackson
Defendant:
Kenneth Sconyers and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bass v. Sconyers (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00594
Plaintiff:
Tommy Bass
Defendant:
Kenneth Sconyers and Prison HCU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Golston v. Sconyers et al
as 5:2013cv01526
Petitioner:
Anthony Golston
Respondent:
Kenneth Sconyers and The Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Conley v. Darbouze et al (INMATE 1)(CONSENT)
as 2:2013cv00583
Plaintiff:
Roger Glen Conley
Defendant:
Jean Darbouze , Kenneth Sconyers and Kim Tobias Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Bruton et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00562
Plaintiff:
Isaac Isahas Washington
Defendant:
Mark Bruton and Kenneth Sconyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Sconyers et al
as 2:2013cv01427
Petitioner:
Deoz Thomas
Respondent:
Kenneth Sconyers and The Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mosley v. Sconyers et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00532
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Benard Mosley
Defendant:
Kenneth Sconyers , Cpt. Strickland , Mrs. Mosley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
