Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Virola v. Gonyo et al
as 1:2024cv01393
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Virola
Defendant:
Joshua Dubois, Blake Dobraj, Robert Lombardi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bauer v. Smith
as 24-60521
Plaintiff:
Ty K. Bauer
Defendant:
Kent Smith, individually and in his official capacity as Circuit Judge of the Third Circuit of Mississippi
Bauer v. Smith
as 3:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Ty K. Bauer
Defendant:
Kent Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cook v. Pollan
as 3:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Christopher Casey Cook
Defendant:
Greg Pollan, Mississippi Bureau of Narcotics, John Marsh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ELMORE v. BINGS et al
as 1:2023cv01889
Plaintiff:
KEVIN L. ELMORE and KENNY L. ELMORE
Defendant:
DAVID M. BINGS, JENNIFER L. SNUOK, KERRY JOSEPH FORESTAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Wagner v. Mifflin County Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2023cv00100
Plaintiff:
Marhsall T. Wagner and Marshall T. Wagner
Defendant:
Mifflin County Pennsylvania, Dave Barron, Rick Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kittrell v. Miller et al
as 1:2023cv00078
Plaintiff:
Ulyessie Kittrell
Defendant:
Jack Miller, Jonathan Reed, Kent Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv53378
Plaintiff:
KENT SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Warden, London Correctional Institution
as 1:2020cv00994
Respondent:
Warden, London Correctional Institution
Petitioner:
Kent Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SILVA et al
as 2:2018cv03648
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN KENT SMITH, DAVID TAOBI SILVA and GERROD THOMAS SMITH
Defendant:
BASIL SEGGOS, Suffolk County District Attorney's Office, EVAN LACZI and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640 Indian Tribal Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
