Cases 11 - 20 of 40
Torres v. Butler et al
as 3:2018cv01091
Plaintiff:
Norberto Torres
Defendant:
Kimberly Butler, Jeffrey A. Hutchinson, William Spiller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Hamilton v. Kent Brookman, et al
as 18-1693
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL ROBERT HAMILTON
Defendant - Appellee:
KENT BROOKMAN, Lieutenant, TODD W. COWELL, KIM BUTLER and others
Matthews v. Butler et al
as 3:2018cv00490
Plaintiff:
Raymond Matthews
Defendant:
Kimberly Butler, Anthony Williams, J. Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz v. Godinez et al
as 3:2017cv01259
Defendant:
Salvador Godinez, Donald Stolworthy, Gladyse Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
Elias Diaz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fields v. Godinez et al
as 3:2017cv01258
Plaintiff:
Tuan C. Fields, Sr.
Defendant:
Salvador Godinez, Donald Stolworthy, Gladyse Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crenshaw v. Godinez et al
as 3:2017cv01260
Defendant:
Salvador Godinez, Donald Stolworthy, Gladyse Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Crenshaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blaney v. Godinez et al
as 3:2017cv01099
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Blaney
Defendant:
Salvador Godinez, Donald Stolworthy, Gladyse Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Serio v. Lewis et al
as 1:2017cv06949
Plaintiff:
Raymond Serio
Defendant:
Claudia N. Lewis, Kent Brookman, Officer Hanks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bentz v. Hoppensted et al
as 3:2017cv00654
Plaintiff:
David Robert Bentz
Defendant:
James Hoppensted, Lieutenant Whitley, Kent Brookman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman et al v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv00518
Plaintiff:
Dwaine Coleman and Brian Coleman
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), Kent Brookman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
