Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Levin v. City of Buffalo
as 25-762
Plaintiff:
MAXIM LEVIN and VODKA PROPERTIES LLC
Defendant:
CITY OF BUFFALO, BYRON W. BROWN, individually and in his capacity as the Mayor of the City of Buffalo, JAMES COMERFORD, JR., individually and in his capacity as the Commissioner of the Department of Permit & Inspection Services and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv01789
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
King, III v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2025cv01216
Plaintiff:
James Donald King, III
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Unknown Officers, Kevin Coyne and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
COYNE v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 2:2024cv00446
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Unknown:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
KEVIN COYNE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
COYNE v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER

as 2:2022cv00327
Plaintiff:
KEVIN COYNE
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
COYNE v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER

as 2:2020cv00435
Plaintiff:
KEVIN COYNE
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Levin et al v. City of Buffalo et al

as 1:2020cv01511
Defendant:
Tracy Krug, James Comerford, Jr., Empire Dismantlement Co. and others
Plaintiff:
Maxim Levin and Vodka Properties LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
COYNE v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER

as 2:2016cv00536
Plaintiff:
KEVIN COYNE
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
COYNE v. KEYSTONE SERVICE SYSTEMS, INC.
as 5:2015cv00893
Plaintiff:
KEVIN COYNE
Defendant:
KEYSTONE SERVICE SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.