Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Alston et al v. Baltimore Gas & Electric Company et al
as 1:2022cv01061
Plaintiff:
Kevin Alston, Marcus Ragsdale, Trillane Hill and others
Defendant:
Baltimore Gas & Electric Company, Exelon Corporation, Exelon Business Services Company, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Alston v. Baltimore Gas & Electric Company et al
as 1:2020cv02317
Defendant:
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union 410, Exelon Corporation, Exelon Business Services Company, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Alston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kevin Alston v. Wisconsin Court Of Appeal
as 13-7186
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kevin Alston
Defendant - Appellee:
Wisconsin Court Of Appeals
United States of America v. $48,903.06 in U.S Currency
as 1:2013cv03137
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$48,903.06 in U.S Currency
Claimant:
Kevin Alston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
ALSTON V. WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
as 1:2013cv00477
Plaintiff:
KEVIN ALSTON
Defendant:
WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kevin Alston v. Wisconsin Court of Appeal
as 10-2395
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN ALSTON
Defendant - Appellee:
WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
Alston v. Wisconsin Court of Appeals
as 2:2010cv00443
Plaintiff:
Kevin Alston
Defendant:
Wisconsin Court of Appeals
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00361
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv02382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Chandler v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2007cv10412
Plaintiff:
Barrett Chandler
Defendant:
The City of New York, New York City Police Dept., Raymond W. Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
