Cases 1 - 6 of 6
FINNEGAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv02729
Plaintiff:
KEVIN FINNEGAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Finnegan et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv00059
Plaintiff:
Crystal Lynn Finnegan and Kevin Finnegan
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rosario et al v The Retirement Board of the Policemen's Annuity and Benefit Fund of the City of Chicago et al
as 1:2010cv01512
Plaintiff:
George Rosario , Eusebio Razo , Ervin Ternoir and others
Defendant:
The Retirement Board of the Policemen's Annuity and Benefit Fund of the City of Chicago, Stephanie D. Neely, Steven J. Lux and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Al's Service Center, et al v. BP Products North America, Inc
as 09-3006
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AL'S SERVICE CENTER, an Illinois Corporation and KEVIN FINNEGAN, individually doing business as Al's Service Center
Defendant - Appellee:
BP PRODUCTS NORTH AMERICA, INCORPORATED, a Maryland Corporation
UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO/CLC LOCAL 4-406 et al v. RADOMSKI et al
as 2:2009cv02712
Plaintiff:
UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO/CLC LOCAL 4-406, ALEXANDER RADOMSKI, DANIEL PICARD and others
Defendant:
CAMBREX, INC., CASCHEM, INC., THE RETIREMENT PLAN FOR NON-SALARIED EMPLOYEES OF THE CASCHEM INC. BAYONNE PLANT and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Al's Svc Ctr, et al v. BP Amoco Chem Co, et al
as 1:2003cv04508
Plaintiff:
Al's Service Center and Kevin Finnegan
Defendant:
BP Products North America Inc
Counter_claimant:
BP Products North America Inc
Counter_defendant:
Al's Service Center and Kevin Finnegan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
