Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Romano v. Ulrich
as 21-1303
Defendant / Appellee:
Mark Cunningham, Kevin Ulrich, C.O., Daniel Leonard, C.O. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Anthony Romano
Romano v. Ulrich
as 17-2884
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Anthony Romano
Defendant - Appellee:
Kevin Ulrich, C.O., Joseph Cianci, C.O., Gary Coviello, C.O. and others
Kathy Clark, et al v. Centene Corporation
as 15-50606
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MARGUERIETTE SCHMOLL, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, KEVIN ULRICH, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, AMY ENDSLEY, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellant:
CENTENE COMPANY OF TEXAS, L.P.
Kathy Clark, et al v. Centene Corporation
as 15-50606
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KATHY CLARK, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, AMY ENDSLEY, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, SUSAN GRIMMETT, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CENTENE COMPANY OF TEXAS, L.P.
Ulrich et al v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00170
Plaintiff:
Candance Ulrich and Kevin Ulrich
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cooper v. Century 21 Stores, LLC. et al
as 2:2014cv00817
Defendant:
Century 21 Stores, LLC, Ian Deabracio and Kevin Ulrich
Plaintiff:
Mark Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Romano v. Ulrich et al
as 1:2013cv00633
Plaintiff:
Anthony Romano
Defendant:
Kevin Ulrich, Joseph Cianci, Gary Coviello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark et al v. Centene Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv00174
Defendant:
Centene Company of Texas, L.P., Centene Corporation and Superior HealthPlan, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kathy Clark, Amy Endsley, Susan Grimmett and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
