Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10096
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Abdel-Fattah v. Kelly et al
as 1:2022cv00125
Plaintiff:
Khaled Abdel-Fattah
Defendant:
James D. Kelly and Kelly Law PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Abdel-Fattah v. Eno et al
as 1:2020cv10956
Defendant:
Mark T. Eno and Christine Eno
Plaintiff:
Khaled Abdel-Fattah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv11342
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
In Re: Ocular Therapeutix Inc
as 19-1557
Defendant / Appellee:
AMARPREET SAWHNEY, ANDREW HURLEY, OCULAR THERAPEUTIX, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OLEG TKALYCH, WILLIAM L. STEPHENS, KAVITA MEHTA and others
Interested Party:
GLENN STEPHENSON, YAU HUNG CHOW, OCULAR THERAPEUTIX INVESTOR GROUP and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS GALLAGHER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, DYLAN CARAKER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and SHAWNA KIM, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Khaled v. McDonald
as 1:2019cv10993
Petitioner:
Omar Khaled
Respondent:
Joseph D. McDonald, Jr., Todd Lyons, Matheus Witiaker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00431
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00432
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
GALLAGHER v. OCULAR THERAPEUTIX, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv12288
Plaintiff:
THOMAS GALLAGHER
Defendant:
OCULAR THERAPEUTIX, INC. , AMARPREET SAWHNEY , ANDREW HURLEY and others
Movant:
Khaled Ramadan , Ocular Therapeutix Investor Group , Osi Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
