Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Saheb Khan et al v. Jayco, Inc.
as 3:2020cv00954
Plaintiff:
Madalyn I. Saheb Khan and Khalid Saheb Khan
Defendant:
Jayco Inc and Ford Motor Company
Not Classified By Court:
Hon. Michael P Scopelitis
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Sabeehullah et al v. Fairlife LLC et al
as 2:2019cv00222
Defendant:
SUE McCLOSKEY, MIKE McCLOSKEY, FAIRLIFE, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MOHAMMAD SABEEHULLAH, NABIL KHAN, Kathryn Welsh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, Inc. et al v. Khan
as 1:2016cv06636
Plaintiff:
Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, Inc.
Defendant:
Shakeel Ullah Khan and Morton Gas & Food, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GEA Group AG v. Flex-N-Gate Corporation, et al
as 13-2135
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GEA GROUP AG
Defendant / Appellee:
SHAHID KHAN
Defendant:
FLEX-N-GATE CORPORATION
GEA Group AG v. Flex-N-Gate Corporation, et al
as 13-2135
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEA GROUP AG
Defendant - Appellee:
FLEX-N-GATE CORPORATION and SHAHID KHAN
GEA Group AG v. Flex-N-Gate Corporation, et al
as 11-1645
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEA GROUP AG
Defendant - Appellee:
FLEX-N-GATE CORPORATION and SHAHID KHAN
GEA Group AG v. Flex-N-Gate Corporation, et al
as 10-1697
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GEA GROUP AG
Defendant / Appellee:
FLEX-N-GATE CORPORATION and SHAHID KHAN
GEA Group AG v. Flex-N-Gate Corporation, et al
as 10-1697
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEA GROUP AG
Defendant - Appellee:
FLEX-N-GATE CORPORATION and SHAHID KHAN
Isa Chicago Wholesale, Inc. v. Khan et al
as 1:2009cv03942
Plaintiff:
Isa Chicago Wholesale, Inc.
Defendant:
Fahad Khan and Evelina Shoplyanskaya
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
GEA Group AG v. Flex-N-Gate Corporation et al
as 2:2009cv02106
Plaintiff:
GEA Group AG and GEA Group AG
Defendant:
Flex-N-Gate Corporation and Shahid Khan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
