Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Morgan v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv20147
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Morgan
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00419
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Morguloff v. Baylor Health Care System et al
as 3:2014cv01065
Plaintiff:
Barry Morguloff
Defendant:
Baylor Health Care System , Baylor Regional Medical Center at Plano , Christopher Duntsch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402
Passmore et al v. Baylor Health Care System et al
as 3:2013cv05016
Plaintiff:
Robert Leroy Passmore, III and Kelly Passmore
Defendant:
Baylor Health Care System , Baylor Regional Medical Center of Plano and Kimberly Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 3:2013cv05292
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Morgan
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America and Accenture LLP, LTD Benefit Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Morgan v. Life Insurance Company of North America et al
as 2:2013cv00684
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Morgan
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America and Accenture LLP, LTD Benefit Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Henretty v. USA
as 4:2012cv00171
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Kimberly Morgan Henretty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
