Cases 1 - 10 of 734
Rowley et al v. Kingsley Management
as 2:2024cv00725
Plaintiff:
Amy Rowley and Shane Kendall
Defendant:
Kingsley Management
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Kingsley Management Corp, et al. v. City of Santa Ana, et al.
as 24-5934
Defendant:
DOES, 1-10, Inclusive and CITY OF SANTA ANA, a municipal corporation
Plaintiff:
KMC CA MANAGEMENT, LLC, a Utah limited liability company, COUNTRY CLUB LAND 098, LP, a Utah limited partnership and KINGSLEY MANAGEMENT CORP, a Utah corporation
GRIFFITH v. WAYNE COUNTY et al
as 1:2024cv01668
Defendant:
QUALITY CORRECTIONAL CARE, JENNIFER COOK, MARISSA KINGSLEY and others
Plaintiff:
LEAH GRIFFITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ariegwe v. Godfrey, et al.
as 24-5807
Petitioner:
KINGSLEY U. ARIEGWE
Respondent:
DIMITRI GODFREY and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MONTANA
United States v. Brandon Robinson
as 24-2730
Defendant:
Brandon Kingsley Robinson
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Otuya v. Garland
as 24-5221
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
KINGSLEY OTUYA
Ariegwe v. Godfrey et al
as 4:2024cv00074
Petitioner:
Kingsley Ariegwe
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Montana and Dimitri Godfrey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lanesborough 2000, LLC v. Nextres, LLC
as 24-2211
Petitioner:
LANESBOROUGH 2000, LLC
Defendant:
PATRICK R. KINGSLEY
Respondent:
NEXTRES, LLC
Ononuju v. Virginia Housing
as 2:2024cv00516
Defendant:
Virginia Housing
Plaintiff:
Kingsley Azubuike Ononuju
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Personal Property)
Hill et al v. City of New York
as 1:2024cv06094
Plaintiff:
Hakeem Adekoya, Olukemi Akinware, Anthony Acevedo and others
Pretrial Service:
Ana Santana
Defendant:
City of New York
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 207 (a) FLSA: Action for Overtime Wage Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
