Cases 1 - 10 of 29
KISS Nail Products, Inc. et al v. Proxima Inc.
as 2:2024cv00494
Counter Defendant:
KISS Nail Products, Inc. and Ivy Enterprises, Inc.
Defendant:
Proxima Inc. doing business as Nicka K New York, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Proxima Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Melwani v. Kiss Nail Products, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv06837
Plaintiff:
Prakash Melwani
Defendant:
Kiss Nail Products, Inc., AST Systems, LLC, Peter Criss and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Melwani v. Kiss Nail Products, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv06976
Plaintiff:
Prakash Melwani
Defendant:
Kiss Nail Products, Inc., AST Systems, LLC, Peter Criss and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
EBIN NEW YORK, INC. v. KISS NAIL PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv02369
Defendant:
YONG JIN CHANG, KISS NAIL PRODUCTS, INC. and JOHN CHANG
Plaintiff:
EBIN NEW YORK, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03329
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv05271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
LASHIFY, INC. v. KISS NAIL PRODUCTS, INC.
as 1:2021mc00028
Defendant:
KISS NAIL PRODUCTS, INC.
Plaintiff:
LASHIFY, INC.
LASHIFY, INC. v. KISS NAIL PRODUCTS, INC.
as 1:2021mc00029
Not Classified By Court:
LASHIFY, INC.
Respondent:
PT MAHKOTA TRI ANGJAYA and KISS NAIL PRODUCTS, INC.
Andis Company v. Kiss Nail Products Inc et al
as 2:2020cv01219
Plaintiff:
Andis Company
Defendant:
Ivy Enterprises Inc and Kiss Nail Products Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
LASHIFY, INC. v. KISS NAIL PRODUCTS, INC.
as 1:2020cv10023
Defendant:
KISS NAIL PRODUCTS, INC.
Plaintiff:
LASHIFY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
