Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 130
Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Cen, et al v. Patricia Grantham, et al
as 19-15597
Defendant / Appellant: PATRICIA A. GRANTHAM, Klamath National Forest Supervisor and UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE
Plaintiff / Appellee: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION INFORMATION CENTER, KLAMATH-SISKIYOU WILDLANDS CENTER and KLAMATH FOREST ALLIANCE
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL
Amicus Curiae: COUNTY OF SISKIYOU
Center for Bio. Diversity, et al v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, et al
as 19-15102
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: CALIFORNIA FORESTRY ASSOCIATION, a California nonprofit corporation, AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, an Oregon nonprofit corporation, WASHINGTON FOREST PROTECTION ASSOCIATION, a Washington nonprofit corporation and others
Defendant / Appellant: DAVID LONGLY BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the Interior, MARGARET EVERSON, her official capacity as Principal Deputy Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Plaintiff / Appellee: SIERRA FOREST LEGACY, KLAMATH-SISKIYOU WILDLANDS CENTER, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION INFORMATION CENTER and others
Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center et al v. Grantham et al
as 2:2018at01604
Defendant: United States Forest Service and Patricia A. Grantham
Plaintiff: Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center, Klamath Forest Alliance and Environmental Protection Information Center
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 181
Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center et al v. Grantham et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv02785
Defendant: United States Forest Service and Patricia A. Grantham
Plaintiff: Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center, Klamath Forest Alliance and Environmental Protection Information Center
Intervenor Defendant: American Forest Resource Council
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 181
Klamath Siskiyou Wildlands Center v. United States Department of Interior
as 1:2018cv00683
Plaintiff: Klamath Siskiyou Wildlands Center
Defendant: United States Department of Interior
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Klamath Siskiyou Wildlands Center et al v. Bureau of Land Management We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00997
Defendant: Bureau of Land Management
Plaintiff: Cascadia Wildlands, Klamath Siskiyou Wildlands Center and Oregon Wild
Intervenor Defendant: Murphy Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Concerned Friends of the Winem, et al v. USFS, et al
as 17-35412
Plaintiff - Appellee: CONCERNED FRIENDS OF THE WINEMA, KLAMATH SISKIYOU WILDLANDS CENTER, OREGON WILD and others
Defendant - Appellant: UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE and UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Intervenor-Defendant: IVERSON MANAGEMENT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00441
Plaintiff: AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES and others
Movant: SODA MOUNTAIN WILDERNESS COUNCIL , KLAMATH SISKIYOU WILDLANDS CENTER and OREGON WILD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Murphy Company et al v. Trump et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00285
Defendant: Bureau of Land Management, Kevin Haugrud, Donald J. Trump and others
Intervenor Defendant: Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center, Oregon Wild, Soda Mountain Wilderness Council and others
Plaintiff: Murphy Company and Murphy Timber Investments, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ASSOCIATION OF O&C COUNTIES v. TRUMP et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00280
Defendant: DONALD J. TRUMP , UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and others
Plaintiff: ASSOCIATION OF O&C COUNTIES
Movant: SODA MOUNTAIN WILDERNESS COUNCIL , KLAMATH-SISKIYOU WILDLANDS CENTER and OREGON WILD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?