Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-10709
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01292
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Avila et al v. Perdue Farms, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv03018
Defendant:
Koch Foods of Cumming LLC, Simmons Prepared Foods, Inc., Harrison Poultry, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Eusebio Avila and Ashley Scott
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Jien et al v. Perdue Farms, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv02521
Defendant:
Mar-Jac Holdings, Inc., Simmons Prepared Foods, Inc., Harrison Poultry, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Elaisa Clement, Kieo Jibidi and Judy Jien
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Robinson et al v. Tysons Foods, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv02960
Defendant:
Koch Foods of Cumming LLC, MAR-JAC Poultry MS, LLC, Harrison Poultry, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Glenda Robinson and Michael Dewayne Patrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Earnest v. Perdue Farms, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv02680
Defendant:
Simmons Prepared Foods, Inc., Harrison Poultry, Inc., Mar-Jac Poultry, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Emily Earnest
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Robinson et al v. Tyson Foods, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv02959
Defendant:
Koch Foods of Cumming LLC, MAR-JAC Poultry MS, LLC, Harrison Poultry, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Glenda Robinson and Michael Dewayne Patrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00167
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv02181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
