Cases 1 - 10 of 767
Nix v. Swartz et al.
as 3:2024cv01495
Defendant:
Corey R. McConnell, Mina N. Sedky, Juan A. Hernandez and others
Plaintiff:
Delshaun R. Nix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kaufman v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 2:2024cv12198
Plaintiff:
Kory Kaufman
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
(HC) Darty v. Warden
as 2:2024cv02192
Petitioner:
Kory Darty
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States of America v. Overton
as 24-2071
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
KORI E. OVERTON and KI
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01708
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01709
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Korie Schmidt v. United States District Court
as 2:2024cv05523
Plaintiff:
Korie Schmidt
Defendant:
United States District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Schmidt v. United States District Court for the Central District of California
as 24-3617
Petitioner:
KORIE SCHMIDT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Interested Party:
WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Korie Schmidt v. Wells Fargo Bank
as 2:2024cv04660
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank
Plaintiff:
Korie Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Putney v. Harford County Government et al
as 1:2024cv01459
Defendant:
Sheriff Jeffrey R. Gahler, Warden Daniel Galbraith and Harford County Government
Plaintiff:
Kory Putney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
