Cases 1 - 10 of 1,347
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv03313
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv03454
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00926
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 vc Fed. Question: Violation of Constitutional Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv03427
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv01194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv01199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Gonzalez Barreto v. Bondi, in her official capacity as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 6:2025cv00684
Plaintiff:
Sicxela Alexandra Gonzalez Barreto
Defendant:
Pam Bondi, in her official capacity as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, Secretary Kristi Noem, Acting Director Kika Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Isifan v. Noem et al
as 1:2025cv04257
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Isifan
Defendant:
Secretary Kristi Noem and Kevin J. Riddle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Doe v. NOEM et al
as 1:2025cv04258
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
KRISTI NOEM and Todd Lyons
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2025cv01576
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
