Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Baker v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2020cv02409
Defendant:
Commissioner Andrew Saul and Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Kristie Baker
Interested Party:
USAO-SS-Noticing and SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
Johnson v. Ruh et al
as 6:2020cv06018
Defendant:
Kristie Baker, Sergeant Harrison, Deputy Warden White and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Samuel Johnson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02115
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Sanofi US Services Inc. and Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kristie Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAKER v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2019cv01599
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, TAKEDA DEVELOPMENT CENTER AMERICAS, INC. F/K/A TAKEDA GLOBAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CENTER, INC., TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY LIMITED and others
Plaintiff:
KRISTIE BAKER
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Roberts et al
as 4:2018cv00222
Plaintiff:
Wilbert L Johnson
Defendant:
Tim Roberts, Kristie Baker, Jerry Bradshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caesar L. Clay v. Kristie Baker, et al
as 14-1600
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Caesar L. Clay
Defendant - Appellee:
Kristie Baker, Parole Officer, Arkansas Parole Board, Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Parole Board and John Felts, Chairman, Arkansas Parole Board
Baker v Pfizer Inc
as 2:2014cv00565
Plaintiff:
Kristie Baker
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coley v. Llewllyn et al
as 4:2014cv00095
Plaintiff:
Keith Eldred Coley
Defendant:
Jerry Llewllyn, Kristie Baker, Leroy Brownlee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clay v. Baker et al
as 5:2014cv00013
Plaintiff:
Caesar L Clay
Defendant:
Kristie Baker, Ray Hobbs and John Felts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
