Cases 1 - 6 of 6
USSEC v. Matthew Beasley, et al
as 23-15512
Plaintiff / Appellee:
U.S. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
MATTHEW WADE BEASLEY, BEASLEY LAW GROUP PC, JEFFREY J. JUDD and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
OMID SHAHABE and KRISTIE YOUNG, Proposed Intervenors
Receiver:
GEOFF WINKLER
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Beasley et al
as 2:2022cv00612
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Matthew Wade Beasley, Christopher R. Humphries, J&J Consulting Services, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
Beasley Law Group PC and Jeffrey J. Judd
Not Classified By Court:
Petitioning Creditors, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Vyonne S. Mendenhall and others
Interested Party:
Nevada Housing Solutions, LLC, U.S. Bank National Association, U.S. Bancorp Investments, Inc. and others
Receiver:
Danny Ayala, as court appointed receiver for Beasley Law Group LPC, Geoff Winkler and Credit Union 1
Cross Claimant:
Jason A. Jenne
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Omid Shahabe and Kristie Young
In Re:
Robinhood Markets, Inc.
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Aaron Grigsby and Grigsby Law Group
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Davis v. Aparicio
as 6:2021cv00443
Plaintiff:
Cori Leann Davis
Defendant:
Reynaldo Rafael Aparicio, Reyson Trucking LLC, Kristy Sanchez Young Representative of the Estate of Christopher Ladale Young and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Young v. Emeritus Corporation
as 5:2014cv01005
Defendant:
Emeritus Corporation
Plaintiff:
Kristie Young
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661
Manuel et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv14840
Plaintiff:
Kristy Young Manuel and Shane Manuel
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Young v. Citi Mortgage, Inc.
as 4:2008cv00139
Plaintiff:
Kristy Young, Kristy Young and Kristy Young
Defendant:
Citi Mortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
