Cases filed in New York
Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv02912
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv06141
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01531
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1182
Vidhja v. Whitaker et al
as 1:2019cv00613
Respondent: FO Director Thomas R. Decker, Matthew Whitaker and Kristjen Nielsen
Petitioner: Prele Vidhja
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00350
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Toe v. Whitaker, Attorney General of the United States et al
as 6:2019cv06007
Respondent: Matthew G Whitaker, Attorney General of the United States, Kristjen Nielsen and Thomas E. Feeley
Petitioner: David Toe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Adames v. Decker et al
as 1:2018cv11607
Defendant: Mimi Tsankov, Wen-Ting Cheng, Thomas R. Decker and others
Plaintiff: Willi Adames
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2018cv06900
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv06937
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2018cv06841
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?