Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Cardello-Smith v. Combs et al
as 2:2024cv12737
Defendant:
Warren Evans, P. Diddy, Patrick Jackman and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lee Cardello-Smith
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Carpenter v. King et al
as 1:2024cv00465
Petitioner:
Carli Carpenter
Respondent:
Chris King, Kym Worthy, Patricia Penman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carpenter v. King et al
as 2:2024cv11176
Petitioner:
Carli Carpenter
Respondent:
C. King, Kym Worthy, Patricia Penman and others
McCarren et al v. Fresard et al
as 2:2023cv12135
Plaintiff:
Michael D McCarren, Maurice A Stewart, Charles Whitman and others
Defendant:
Patricia Fresard, Richard Lynch, Zenbell Brown and others
Williams v. Britten et al
as 2:2022cv12605
Petitioner:
Michael B. Williams
Respondent:
K. Britten, Michigan Department of Correctional and Kym Worthy
Harrison v. Worthy et al
as 2:2022cv12312
Plaintiff:
Matthew Thomas Harrison
Defendant:
Kym Worthy, Wayne County and Warren C. Evans
Nelson v. Worthy et al
as 2:2022cv11195
Plaintiff:
Wayne J. Nelson
Defendant:
Kym Worthy, Mike Duggan, Commissioner of Detroit Wayne County and others
Powell, et al. v. Michigan, State of, et al
as 5:2022cv10816
Plaintiff:
Michael Elliot Powell sui juris, Settlor and Trust Protector of Family of Truh Allah [Irrevocable Express] Trust Doing business as Registered Trust Agent, Michael Elliot Powell sui juris, Settlor and Trust Protector of Family of Truth Allah [Irrevocable Express] Trust Doing business as Registered Trust Agent and Family of Trust Allah Trust Doing business as Registered Trust Agent
Defendant:
Gretchen Whitmer, Dana Nessel, Detroit, City of and others
Nelson v. Nessel et al
as 2:2022cv10799
Plaintiff:
Wayne Nelson
Defendant:
Dana Nessel, Kym Worthy and Mike Duggan
Lynem v. Worthy
as 4:2021cv10534
Plaintiff:
Charles Lynem
Defendant:
Kym Worthy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
