Cases 1 - 10 of 366
Henderson v. Bryant et al
as 4:2024cv01048
Defendant:
Cornelius Bryant, John Doe Company, Ann Rito and others
Plaintiff:
Larry L. Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3604 Title VIII - Housing Discrimination
Moore v. Henderson, et al.
as 24-983
Plaintiff:
KENNETH J MOORE
Defendant:
RICHARD L HENDERSON, MD, TIMOTHY G CAUDILL, MD, SIR REYES, PA and others
Henderson v. Sproul
as 3:2024cv00046
Petitioner:
Emmanuel L. Henderson
Respondent:
David Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HENDERSON et al v. MYERS et al
as 1:2023cv02153
Plaintiff:
BARBARA L. HENDERSON and J. DAVID HENDERSON
Defendant:
JAZMYN P. MYERS and STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04734
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Rios v. Walters et al
as 5:2023cv00286
Plaintiff:
John Gabriel Rios
Defendant:
Darren Walters, Katrina White, Derek Hester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rios v. Mason et al
as 5:2023cv00270
Plaintiff:
John Gabriel Rios
Defendant:
Wanda Mason, Derek Hester, Rebecca McKibben and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rios v. Mason et al
as 5:2023cv00245
Plaintiff:
John Gabriel Rios
Defendant:
Wanda Mason, Derek Hester, Rebecca McKibben and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Henderson et al
as 4:2023cv05142
Plaintiff:
Kenneth J Moore
Defendant:
Richard L Henderson, MD, Timothy G Caudill, MD, Sir Reyes, PA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Festus, City of et al
as 4:2023cv01048
Plaintiff:
Alfred L. Henderson
Defendant:
Festus, City of, Festus Police Department, Officer Lewis Pippin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
