Cases 1 - 10 of 233
Hughes v. Warden (Current) FCI Jesup, Jesup Ga et al
as 2:2025cv00017
Petitioner:
Dawon L. Hughes
Respondent:
Warden (Current) FCI Jesup, Jesup Ga, Colette Peters and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Blake v. Wills et al
as 3:2024cv02359
Defendant:
L Hughes, Warden Wills and IDOC
Plaintiff:
Shaidon Blake
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. McDermott
as 2:2024cv01353
Respondent:
Jennifer McDermott
Petitioner:
Etter L Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv02190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Walker v. Wexford Health Source et al
as 1:2024cv09702
Defendant:
Jane Doe 7, Jane Doe 3, Jane Doe 4 and others
Plaintiff:
James E. Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Hughes v. McDermott
as 2:2024cv00270
Petitioner:
Etter L Hughes
Respondent:
Warden Jennifer McDermott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hughes Faulk v. United States District Court
as 2:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Michelle L Hughes Faulk
Defendant:
United States District Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hughes Faulk v. US District Court
as 3:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Michelle L. Hughes Faulk
Defendant:
US District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hughes Faulk v. Washington County Circuit Court et al
as 3:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Michelle L. Hughes Faulk
Defendant:
Washington County Circuit Court and State of Oregon Judicial Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
