Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Jones, III v. Spurlock et al
as 9:2023cv00222
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Jones, III
Defendant:
Gwendolyn Spurlock, Sarah Horace, Robert L. Tanner, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rossi Wade & Daughter (Jane Doe) v. Truist Bank et al
as 1:2022cv01268
Plaintiff:
Rossi Wade & Daughter (Jane Doe)
Defendant:
Truist Bank, The General Insurance Company, SunTrust Banks, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Employee Benefits
Wade et al v. Truist Bank et al
as 8:2022cv00287
Plaintiff:
Rossi Wade and Daughter (Jane Doe)
Defendant:
Truist Bank, Suntrust Bank and BB&T Merger, Suntrust "Truist" Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Rossi Wade v. Truist Bank
as 21-1570
Defendant / Appellee:
MAURICE STEWARD, Branch Manager, JODI MEADOWS, Operations Manager, THOMAS N. THOMPSON, Member, Truist Bank Board of Directors and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROSSI WADE, & DAUGHTER (JANE DOE)
Wade v. Truist Bank et al
as 8:2020cv00656
Defendant:
Anna R. Cablik, Suntrust Corp., Steven C. Voorhees and others
Plaintiff:
Rossi Wade
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wade v. Truist Bank et al
as 1:2020cv00169
Defendant:
Anna R. Cablik, Suntrust Corp., Steven C. Voorhees and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe and Rossi Wade
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00007
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Gafford v. SunTrust Banks, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv05175
Defendant:
Donna S. Morea, Agnes B. Scanlan, David M. Ratcliffe and others
Plaintiff:
Rachael Gafford
LR Trust v. SunTrust Banks, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01622
Defendant:
Donna S. Morea, William H. Rogers, Jr., David M. Ratcliffe and others
Plaintiff:
LR Trust
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
