Cases 1 - 10 of 67
Maye v. Correctional Center of Northeast Ohio et al.
as 3:2024cv01310
Defendant:
Dennis Sullivan, fnu Haburn, fnu Springer and others
Plaintiff:
Ricco L. Maye
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
MAYES et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv04936
Plaintiff:
ROBIN MAYES and THE ESTATE OF DEBORAH L. MAYES, DECEASED
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., LLT MANAGEMENT LLC and others
Not Yet Classified:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mayes v. Province
as 23-6161
Petitioner / Appellant:
LAWRENCE L. MAYES
Respondent / Appellee:
GREG PROVINCE, Warden
Mayes v. State of Oklahoma
as 5:2023cv00822
Petitioner:
Lawrence L Mayes
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mayes v. Buss
as 4:2023cv00176
Petitioner:
Lawrence Mayes and Lawrence L Mayes
Respondent:
Janet Dowling and David Buss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maye v. Corrections Center of Northeast Ohio, et al.
as 3:2022cv02176
Plaintiff:
Ricco L Maye
Defendant:
Craig Eiden, Masser, Kevin Bloom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maye v. Eiden et al
as 2:2022cv04249
Plaintiff:
Ricco L Maye
Defendant:
Craig Eiden, Masser, Kevin Bloom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. Mayes et al
as 1:2022cv04610
Plaintiff:
Deandre Bradley
Defendant:
L. Mayes, John Doe and City Of Chicago Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayes v. Dowling et al
as 5:2022cv00437
Petitioner:
Lawrence L Mayes
Respondent:
Janet Dowling and K Nikki Kirpatrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
