Cases 1 - 10 of 723
Robinson v. The Coca-Cola Company
as 24-3149
Defendant:
ADAM LEARMAN, THE COCA-COLA COMPANY, DAVID P. and others
Plaintiff:
LAKIEA L. ROBINSON
BASF Corporation v. ALMB Corp. et al
as 3:2024cv00541
Defendant:
ALMB Corp. also known as ALMB Corporation doing business as Knott's Body Shop, Dennis Robinson, Dennis L. Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
BASF Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
MacDonald v. State of Alaska, et al.
as 24-5254
Defendant:
JENNIFER MAE HEIKKILA, KRISTINE MOORE, ALASKA OFFICE OF CHILDRENS SERVICES INC. and others
Plaintiff:
THERESA MARGARET MACDONALD
United States v. Robert Robinson, III
as 24-2717
Defendant:
Robert L. Robinson, III
Plaintiff:
United States of America
United States v. Jermaine Robinson
as 24-2149
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jermaine Lamar Robinson, also known as Jermaine Leonard Robinson, also known as Jermaine L. Robinson
Robinson v. Cyber Space et al
as 2:2024cv00323
Plaintiff:
Vickie L. Robinson
Defendant:
Fiber Internet MetroNet, Cyber Space, CEO Todd Vasos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Janet L. Robinson v. Hemet Unified School District
as 5:2024cv00486
Plaintiff:
Janet L. Robinson
Defendant:
Hemet Unified School District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
INGMIRE v. ROBINSON
as 3:2024cv00033
Petitioner:
CHARLES D INGMIRE, II
Respondent:
COLEMAN L ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. NRHA et al
as 2:2023cv00662
Plaintiff:
Vickie L. Robinson
Defendant:
NRHA, Alex, James Lynn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Robinson v. Direct TV Internet et al
as 2:2023cv00664
Plaintiff:
Vickie L. Robinson
Defendant:
Direct TV Internet, James Lynn, Alex and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
