Cases 1 - 10 of 123
Wang v. Douglas et al
as 3:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
Amy Wang
Defendant:
Donald Jay Douglas and Jill L Douglas
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
Amuwo v. Chang et al
as 1:2023cv02537
Plaintiff:
Quamdeen Adewale Amuwo
Defendant:
Edmond E. Chang, L. Douglas Manschreck, Matthew Moyer and others
Bramble v. Hynes et al
as 1:2023cv05141
Plaintiff:
Reuben Bramble
Defendant:
Mr. Charles H. Hynes, Mr. Flink, Ms. Julie Swartz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Douglas v. McDonough
as 23-1600
Claimant:
WILLIS L. DOUGLAS
Respondent / Appellee:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Wilder v. Rao et al
as 3:2022cv00498
Plaintiff:
L. Douglas Wilder
Defendant:
Michael Rao, Fotis Sotiropoulos, Jacob Belue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Douglas v. Spaulding
as 4:2022cv00862
Petitioner:
Timothy L. Douglas
Respondent:
Stephen Spaulding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Gerald Antoine et al v. Amguard Insurance Company et al
as 2:2022cv01623
Plaintiff:
Gerald Antoine and Franklin L Ferguson, Jr.
Defendant:
Amguard Insurance company, Stacy L Douglas and Alexis N Hishmeh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
DOUGLAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv57296
Plaintiff:
DAVID L DOUGLAS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown et al v. Douglas Capital Management LLC et al
as 1:2021cv01139
Plaintiff:
Brown Trust-dated Clinton & Cristina Brown Trustees and Clinton W Brown
Defendant:
Douglas Capital Management LLC and Brett L Douglas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
