Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Jackson v. Ewert et al
as 2:2022cv00464
Plaintiff:
Christopher L Jackson
Defendant:
Chris Ewert, T Moon and Randall Hepp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Hepp
as 2:2021cv00994
Petitioner:
Christopher L Jackson
Respondent:
Randall R Hepp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. Gantner
as 2:2021cv00640
Plaintiff:
Lonnie L Jackson and Anastacia Sabrina-Loni Jackson
Defendant:
Capt Tom Campbell, Jennifer McDermott, CO II Hendrix and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Vartanian et al
as 2:2020cv01148
Defendant:
Federal Bureau Of Investigation Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Gang Task Force, Chad Vartanian and Richard Bilson
Plaintiff:
Christopher L Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson Sr., Edward v. Foster, Brain
as 3:2020cv00484
Defendant:
Brain Foster
Plaintiff:
Edward L. Jackson Sr.
Not Classified By Court:
WCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson, Terry v. Foster, Brian et al
as 3:2017cv00530
Plaintiff:
Terry L. Jackson
Defendant:
Brian Foster , William Pollard, Stadtmueller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Kuepper et al
as 2:2017cv00627
Plaintiff:
Lonnie L Jackson
Defendant:
CO II Officer Kuepper, Sgt Keller, Lt Norman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Bartow
as 2:2017cv00017
Petitioner:
Andrew L Jackson
Respondent:
Byran Bartow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. United States of America
as 2:2013cv00818
Petitioner:
Robert L Jackson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Jackson v. Division of Hearing and Appeals et al
as 2:2013cv00751
Petitioner:
Christopher L Jackson
Respondent:
Division of Hearing and Appeals and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
