Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Primerica Life Insurance Company v. Kyle et al
as 1:2022cv06290
Plaintiff:
Primerica Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Rukiya L Kyle, Ronald Kyle, III, Rashon Kyle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Kyle et al v. Lema et al
as 3:2021cv00220
Defendant:
Younse Tesfaye Lema, Annur Trans LLC and California Casualty Indemnity Exchange
Plaintiff:
Antonio D. Kyle and Sonya L. Kyle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
KYLE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv74968
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL L KYLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kyle v. Suburban Centre & Auto Service Ltd (JRG1)
as 2:2018cv00086
Defendant:
Suburban Centre & Auto Service Ltd and Robert Marshall
Plaintiff:
Marquae L Kyle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00006
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00300
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00210
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Ronald Kyles v. Burl Cain, Warden
as 13-31298
Petitioner - Appellant:
RONALD L. KYLES
Respondent - Appellee:
BURL CAIN, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY
Hendrix v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2013cv02003
Defendant:
L.C. Adams, Isidro Baca, R. Bruce Bannister and others
Plaintiff:
Jamal Damon Hendrix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
